Standing vs Sitting Calories Calculator
Compare calories burned standing vs sitting per hour.
Enter your weight and hours to see the difference and daily calorie impact.
Standing burns more calories than sitting, because the muscles in your legs, core, and back have to stay engaged to keep you upright. The honest headline is that the difference is small. Smaller than most standing-desk marketing suggests, and smaller than the number this page used to print.
The Formula
Calorie burn is based on MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) values, which measure how much energy an activity requires relative to rest:
Calories per hour = MET × body weight (kg) × 1.05
| Activity | MET | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Sitting quietly | 1.30 | 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities |
| Standing quietly | 1.45 | Back-derived from measured energy expenditure, see below |
| Light walking (2 mph) | 2.80 | 2011 Compendium |
Where the standing figure comes from, and why it is not 1.8
This is the part worth reading. The Compendium lists standing quietly at 1.3, exactly the same as sitting - it does not credit standing with any extra burn at all. Meanwhile plenty of calculators use 1.8, which would make standing worth about 37 kcal an hour for a 70 kg adult.
Neither is right. A 2018 meta-analysis pooling 46 studies that put people in a metabolic chamber found the real difference between sitting and standing averages 0.15 kcal per minute, which is 9 kcal an hour. That works out to a standing MET of roughly 1.45 for a typical adult, and it is the figure this calculator uses.
What This Means in Practice
For a 70 kg (154 lb) person:
- Sitting 1 hour: 1.30 × 70 × 1.05 = 96 kcal
- Standing 1 hour: 1.45 × 70 × 1.05 = 107 kcal
- Difference per hour: 11 kcal
Over an 8-hour workday that is about 88 extra calories. Over 250 workdays, 22,050 calories, or about 2.9 kg (6.3 lbs) of body fat on paper.
On paper is doing real work in that sentence. Trials that actually weigh people who switch to standing desks find much less change than the arithmetic predicts, because appetite rises a little and people move slightly less the rest of the day. Nobody has lost 20 lbs by standing up.
So is a standing desk pointless?
No, but pick the right reason. The evidence for standing desks is decent on back pain, postprandial blood glucose, and self-reported afternoon alertness. It is weak on weight. Buy one for your spine, not your waistline.
The lever that does move calories is walking. The same eight hours spent in light walking rather than sitting is 882 kcal, ten times what standing buys you. That is why treadmill desks and walking meetings show up in the literature and plain standing does not.
Standing Desks in Practice
Alternating between sitting and standing every 30 to 60 minutes beats standing all day. Prolonged standing causes its own problems: leg fatigue, and there is reasonable evidence linking all-day standing work to varicose veins. A rough 1:1 split through the day is the usual recommendation.
Tips to Increase Calorie Burn While Standing
- Shift your weight from foot to foot
- Use an anti-fatigue mat for comfort
- Do calf raises or small movements while standing
- Walk during phone calls - this roughly doubles the calorie burn
Note on Accuracy
Individual results vary based on fitness level, posture, muscle mass, and how still you actually stand. These values are estimates based on MET averages and are suitable for general planning purposes.
How we build and check this calculator
This calculator runs entirely in your browser, so the numbers you enter stay on your device. The math behind it is written by hand and tested against worked examples and standard references before the page goes live.
SuperGlobalCalculator is independently built and maintained. See how we build and verify our calculators.